Circularity beyond recycling

Circularity beyond recycling: Why extending life is tech's biggest carbon lever

Global, May 27, 2026

Why extending asset life is tech's biggest carbon lever

 

For many organisations, circularity starts and stops with recycling. It’s visible, easy to measure, and widely understood. 

But focusing only on what happens at the end of an asset’s life means missing the biggest opportunity: keeping technology in use for longer. 

At a time when organisations are under pressure to reduce emissions, control costs, and strengthen resilience, extending asset life is emerging as one of the most powerful levers available to business and IT leaders. 

The carbon story starts before first use

One of the most persistent misconceptions in sustainable IT is where emissions actually occur. 

In reality, the majority of a device’s carbon footprint is created long before it’s switched on. While the amount varies by device, research shows that for some hardware such as laptops, as much as 75-85% of lifecycle emissions come from manufacturing alone. 

Replacing devices prematurely doesn’t just introduce new cost. It effectively resets the carbon clock, discarding the emissions already invested in production.

Extending the life of existing devices spreads that embodied carbon over a longer period, significantly reducing annual emissions per asset.

Put simply: the most sustainable device isn’t the newest, it’s the one that stays in use the longest. 

Why circularity is often misunderstood

Despite its growing importance, circularity is still widely misinterpreted, often in ways that limit its impact.  

Myth 1 – Circularity is just recycling

Recycling is only one part of the circular economy and the least impactful. Circular models prioritise reuse, repair, and refurbishment before recycling, keeping products at their highest value for as long as possible.

Myth 2 – Circular approaches are expensive 

This assumption often ignores the full economic picture. Circular business models have been shown to reduce material costs, create new revenue streams and build long-term resilience.

Myth 3 – Recycling delivers sufficient impact

By the time a product reaches end-of-life, the majority of emissions have already been incurred. Recycling, while necessary, addresses only a fraction of the overall environmental impact. 

A smarter route to performance and resilience

Extending asset lifecycles isn’t just a sustainability decision. It’s a strategic one. 

Organisations that prioritise longevity are seeing clear commercial benefits:

  • Lower capital expenditure by delaying unnecessary upgrades
  • Reduced total cost of ownership through better asset utilisation 
  • Greater value retention via resale, refurbishment and redeployment
  • Increased supply chain resilience, reducing exposure to material volatility 
  • Stronger ESG performance by tackling emissions at their source

Taken together, these advantages create a compelling business case. One that aligns cost efficiency with environmental sustainability. 

From sustainability initiative to leadership priority

Circularity is no longer a niche concept. It’s becoming a defining factor in how organisations compete and operate. 

As demand for technology accelerates, driven by AI, data growth and digital transformation, so too does pressure on resources, supply chains and carbon budgets. Organisations that continue to rely on short lifecycle, linear consumption models will face increasing costs and scrutiny. 

However, recycling still has a role to play, but not where the biggest impact lies. Real progress comes from shifting focus upstream – keeping assets in use for longer and extracting maximum value from what already exists. 

Because when it comes to reducing carbon in technology, the biggest gains don’t happen at the end of an asset’s life. They happen when you intentionally extend it.  

Related Insights